Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 12:04

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
What is the meaning of "ero" in Japanese?
Russia can stop this any time.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Google’s Pixel 10 phones will reportedly launch on August 13th - The Verge
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
How One Keto Trial Set Off a New War in the Nutrition World - WIRED
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Thank you.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
NZ nutritional biochemist takes her supplement breakthrough to the market - Stuff
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
What’s next?
This map shows what Earth will look like in 250 million years - Notebookcheck
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Jobs report shifts Fed interest rate forecasts - TheStreet
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
South Florida-based Silver Airways shuts down, stranding travelers - Sun Sentinel